有個(gè)網(wǎng)民如是說,其經(jīng)驗(yàn)比較完整,供大家參考:
4B8 oO fh& nu"& http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 x xHY+(m Z\bmW%av Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
w8")w*9Lmg XAD- 'i I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
V@.Ior}w gs^Xf;g vI The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
CCs%%U/= available, but more difficult to use.
